The Difference Between No-Fault And Fault Car Insurance

Car insurance laws are often confusing. Drivers often know that state law requires insurance coverage, but they don’t know to what extent or how to proceed following an accident. In fact, most drivers buy the policies their insurance companies recommend and give little thought to the matter after the fact. While a working knowledge of insurance law isn’t essential for drivers, understanding the basics of no-fault vs. car insurance is.

The Two Types of Insurance Models

Two main models of insurance law will affect an accident claim. Some states follow a no-fault approach, while others observe traditional fault laws. The two have notable differences.

No-Fault States

No-Fault StatesA handful of states follow no-fault laws when it comes to compensation following a car accident. This works the way it sounds – when a car accident occurs, drivers file claims with their own insurance policies, regardless of who is at fault for an accident. At least regarding minor accidents, no-fault insurance states to not consider who is at fault for an accident when paying out claims – they simply pay claimants in accordance of the terms of the policy.

No-fault state insurance companies automatically pay all medical bills using personal injury protection (PIP). On the other hand, property damage claims still rely on the idea of fault.

In some cases, victims of serious injuries may step outside of the no-fault system and file a claim against an at-fault driver for damages. The rules on this vary from state to state, but generally an injury must be severe enough to justify a claim against another driver.

Some states switched to no-fault models to shorten the time for a payout. They argue that instead of spending time in court trying to settle fault arguments, drivers can file a claim and get on the road to recovery sooner. Currently, 12 no-fault states exist: Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Utah.

Fault States

The rest of the United States follows a traditional fault model when it comes to collisions, though the details may vary from state to state. Fault states follow a tort liability system, which means that when a driver causes a crash, his or her insurance company will be responsible for all damages incurred in the accident. Examples include medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and intangible losses like pain and suffering. California, like much of the nation, follows a traditional fault model when it comes to insurance.

States vary, however, when it comes to rules involving comparative negligence. Under the rule of comparative negligence, a driver may have a car accident claim reduced by the percentage of fault he or she shares. For example, if a jury determines that a claimant is 30% at fault for an accident and he or she seeks $500,000 in damages, he or she could only collect $350,000. Generally, a victim can only collect damages when another party is at least 50% at fault for an accident. In some states, like Maryland, a victim may not be able to collect any damages if he or she is partially at fault for an accident.

Insurance rules vary greatly from state to state, but car accidents fall into one of these two categories. California follows a traditional fault model for car accident claims, which makes it easier for victims to collect compensation for their injuries, pain, and suffering. The main disadvantage to this system is court costs and extended timelines when an insurance company refuses to pay – but a personal injury attorney can help streamline the process and get victims back on their feet.

Don’t Settle, Call a California Car Accident Lawyer with Experience Litigating Against Insurance Companies

One former claims adjuster for Allstate told CNN that she would offer as little as $50 to some victims, who would take it, fearing that if they didn’t, they’d get nothing. Accident victims have been walking away from billions of dollars that insurers got to keep. The truth is that you don’t have to settle for a low ball claim or be intimidated by a big insurance company. We have California’s best personal injury attorneys – that specialize in fighting car insurance companies. Please call our office at (888) 488-1391 for a FREE consultation with an experienced car accident injury attorney.

You May Be Entitled to Compensation
Arash Law Practice Area Border/Divider
We’ll tell you if you have a case or not within five minutes, call (888) 488-1391

DISCLAIMER: Information provided on this blog is not formal legal advice. It is generic legal information. Under no circumstances should the information on this page be relied upon when deciding the proper course of a legal action. Always obtain a free and confidential case evaluation from a reputable attorney near you if you think you might have a personal injury lawsuit.

Check More From Our Award-Winning Law Firm
Personal injury lawyers employ a systematic approach when investigating car accidents. This ensures a comprehensive understanding of the event. First, they assess the accident scene, meticulously examining factors such as road conditions, weather, and relevant traffic signs. Following this, they...
Stepping into the driver's seat of a rental car can be a liberating experience, but what happens if an unexpected collision occurs on California's bustling highways? The legal aspects of liability in a rental car crash demand a clear understanding...
After a car accident, victims not only incur injuries but also face significant financial challenges due to substantial medical expenses and lost wages. Making the decision to pursue legal representation in dealing with the aftermath of the crash is important...
Believe it or not, driving in California without shoes is entirely legal. While many Americans believe it is illegal to drive barefoot, no laws in the United States require drivers to wear footwear while on the road. The dangers of driving...