California Technology Accident Lawyers

  • PAY NOTHING UPFRONT
  • OVER $1 BILLION RECOVERED
  • ZERO-FEES UNTIL WE WIN
Recover Lost Wages, Property Damage, and Medical Bills.
Arash Law Practice Area Border/Divider

We’ll review what happened and tell you what options may be available.

Or, get LIVE help now — call our free 24-hour accident hotline at (888) 488-1391

Table of Contents

Who We Help After A Technology Accident

Arash Law represents people in California who sustained injuries due to unsafe technology. These cases may involve self-driving cars, robotaxis, delivery robots, smart devices, medical technology, factory machines, and other automated systems. A technology accident claim may involve product liability, strict liability, or negligence. The key issue may be a defective product, unsafe design, poor warnings, or careless conduct.

If a technology failure caused your injury, you may have the right to seek compensation under California law. These accidents can affect many people, including pedestrians, passengers, workers, consumers, and patients. A robotaxi may hit a pedestrian. Meanwhile, employees face severe physical risks from automated machinery in the workplace. Everyday consumers and patients are equally vulnerable when smart home devices or medical technologies fail.

Technology cases can become hard to prove. Businesses often control software logs, sensor data, and system records. That evidence can change or disappear fast. Acting quickly helps your attorney preserve key data before someone deletes, changes, or overwrites it.

Why Technology Accident Victims Call Arash Law

Technology accident victims call our firm to level the playing field against large companies and their insurance providers. Facing these tech giants alone can be especially challenging, as the laws governing this industry continue to evolve. Our attorneys work to clarify legal nuances, build well-supported cases, and pursue the compensation available to victims under California law.

We can:

  • Analyze the artificial intelligence (AI) system involved in your injury.
  • Trace how the system worked and where it failed.
  • Preserve digital evidence before it disappears.
  • Review chat logs, system records, and automated decision data.
  • Bring in software and AI experts when needed.
  • Check whether a design flaw or a missing safety feature caused your injury.
  • Examine company safety records and developer communications.
  • Identify what the company may have known before releasing the product.
  • File claims against tech companies, insurers, device makers, software vendors, and platform operators.

If an AI system, defective app, or automated technology injured you, call Arash Law at (888) 488-1391.

Who Can File A Technology Accident Claim

People harmed by autonomous technology, AI, or connected systems have the right to bring a claim under California law. That means they could pursue compensation for physical injuries, financial harm, and the personal impact of an accident. Additionally, eligible family members could file wrongful death claims following a fatal technology failure.

The following people may be able to bring a technology accident claim:

  • Direct Injury Victims: This includes pedestrians hit by self-driving vehicles, bystanders hurt by delivery drones, or anyone physically injured by a defective AI-powered system.
  • Passengers & Riders: You may have a claim if you were hurt while riding in a robotaxi or autonomous vehicle. This can apply when a software failure, system error, or technology-related crash, including Tesla accidents, caused your injury.
  • Workers Injured on the Job: Employees hurt by AI-powered machines or autonomous workplace systems may have a workers’ compensation claim. They may also have a separate personal injury case against the technology maker or another third party.
  • AI Chatbot Harm Victims: You may have a claim if a defective AI chatbot response caused real and measurable harm. These cases are highly fact-specific. Physical injury, severe documented emotional distress, financial loss, platform defenses, and the source of the harmful content can all affect whether a claim may proceed.
  • Wrongful Death Beneficiaries: A spouse, child, domestic partner, or other eligible family member may bring a wrongful death claim if a technology accident caused a death.

Why Technology Accident Cases In California Are Different

Most personal injury cases start with a basic question: who caused the injury? Technology accident cases can be harder. The answer may depend on software, data logs, product design, safety testing, and company records. California law can also affect these cases. Specific rules may apply to self-driving vehicles, crash reporting, and the legal defenses used by tech companies.

Important state-related issues may include:

  • Autonomous Vehicle Compliance Notices: California law allows peace officers to issue a Notice of Autonomous Vehicle Noncompliance. Officers may issue this notice when a self-driving vehicle breaks a traffic rule on a public road while autonomous technology is engaged. This notice may help demonstrate that the vehicle failed to comply with California road standards.
  • Mandatory Collision Reporting: Manufacturers testing autonomous vehicles on California roads must report crashes that involve property damage, injury, or death to the California Department of Motor Vehicles within 10 days. These reports are public, and your attorney can review a company’s reporting history.
  • Section 230 Defenses: AI companies may try to use Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as a defense. This law protects internet platforms from liability for certain user-posted content. Some AI companies now argue that it also protects them against claims arising from harmful chatbot responses. Courts are still reviewing how this law applies to AI-generated content.

These issues make technology accident cases different from standard injury cases. Your attorney may need to review government records, company crash reports, software data, and new legal defenses.

$41,950,000.00
A $41.95 million verdict for customers attacked inside a Walmart after a baseball bat left on the sales floor was used in the assault. A jury found Walmart partially responsible based on the evidence presented at trial.
Do I Have A Case
$17,900,000.00
A $17.9 million unanimous verdict against the County of Los Angeles involving two clients harmed in a serious crash. The jury determined the County was entirely at fault after a hard-fought trial that highlighted the clients’ long-term medical needs and the County’s denial of responsibility.
Do I Have A Case
$3,500,000.00
A $3.5 million verdict for a client who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a 2017 collision. Before trial, the insurer initially offered $18,500 and later increased the offer to $300,000. After hearing medical testimony and evidence of the victim’s ongoing symptoms, the jury awarded damages for past and future pain and suffering and future medical care.
Do I Have A Case

(No guarantee of outcome. Results displayed were dependent on unique facts of that case, and different facts will bring different results.)

Who May Be Liable For A Technology Accident?

California law may hold anyone involved in designing, building, or maintaining the defective product liable for a technology accident. Identifying the exact responsible party often involves tracing a complex chain of commerce. Multiple corporations can share fault when an automated system causes physical harm.

A claim may involve defective hardware, flawed software, poor maintenance, unsafe testing, or misleading marketing. California law also allows strict product liability claims for defective products. Under strict liability, you do not need to prove that the company acted carelessly. You only need to show that the product had a defect and that the defect caused your injury, even if you were using the product as intended.

Possible liable parties may include:

  • Manufacturers & Software Developers: These companies build autonomous vehicles, AI systems, and the software that controls them. They may be liable if a hardware defect or software flaw caused the injury.
  • Component Suppliers: A supplier may be responsible if its part was defective. This can include Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors, cameras, mapping tools, or other parts.
  • Vehicle Owners & Operators: A person may be liable if they misuse an autonomous system or fail to step in when human action is required.
  • Fleet Operators: Companies that run robotaxi fleets may be responsible for crashes involving their vehicles. How the company used the vehicle and who controlled it at the time can affect liability.
  • Companies Marketing the Technology: A company may be liable if it advertises a system as safe or reliable while hiding known risks.
  • Third-Party Maintenance Providers: A repair or maintenance company may share fault if poor service helped cause the accident.

Finding every responsible party matters. Missing one company in the chain can limit the compensation available to you.

Injured pedestrian sits beside malfunctioning delivery robot after technology accident outside modern office building
Sandra Bernabe
Sandra Bernabe
Arash Law firm is been an amazing advocate for me in my case. They truly care about you and your needs. Especially my case manager Cynthia Gracia; she’s amazing at what she does. Always ensures to make sure any questions I have are answered and keeps me updated on my case as soon as possible. Super easy communication and response time! Would definitely recommend to others!
Stephen Watson
Stephen Watson
I highly recommend Arash Law, if I could give them more than 5 stars I would give them 10. The staff, particularly Arlene, is outstanding and very responsive, professional, and most of all kind-hearted. They advocated for me and my girlfriend after an auto accident and were superb. They got us 25 times what the insurance company originally offered. In addition to everything else, they were fast and efficient. Not to mention very honest and up-front about what to expect and the range of possible outcomes. Again, I highly recommend this firm and had the best experience i could have imagined. They actually surpassed my hopes and I consider them to be my friends, especially Arlene. Do not hesitate to contact them, you will not be disappointed. Steve W.
Pearl
Pearl
My experience with Arash Law has been outstanding from the start. Their team Cristina and Oscar are incredibly knowledgeable, consistently providing clear explanations and well-informed guidance that has made every step easy to understand. They have also been exceptionally helpful, always quick to respond and willing to go the extra mile to make sure I feel supported. Arash Law handles everything with professionalism and confidence, which gives me that peace of mind and has made a situation that could have been overwhelming feel manageable. Overall, Arash Law delivers excellent service, expert advice, and a truly smooth experience. I highly recommend them to anyone looking for reliable, caring, and effective legal support.
Catherine Davis
Catherine Davis
Great representation, my case representative, Arlene Perez, is wonderful. She explained everything in detail about how injury law suits work. She is prompt in returning messages, shows genuine concern for my well being, and she is very knowledgeable and eager to help. Without having met anyone from the Arash team in person, I can honestly say that this law group takes care of business. Perhaps this is why this firm is one of the best who also represent people from small rural communities, such as myself. Yes, I 100% recommend, you cannot go wrong with this awesome team of experts. They will fight, unwavering, to win cases. Thank you, Arash Legal Group ! You rock !!
Santos Hernandez
Santos Hernandez
Great experience with Arash Law. A big thank you to Erick Ordonez for his professionalism and support. He helped close my case quickly and kept everything transparent. Highly recommend.
Were you injured in a Technology Accident?

What Compensation May Be Available After A Technology Accident?

Victims injured by automated systems can seek comprehensive compensation to rebuild their lives. Under state law, a liable party can be accountable for your financial and personal losses. What you can pursue will heavily depend on the severity of your injuries, the extent of losses, and the facts of your case.

Technology accident victims may pursue compensation for:

  • Economic Damages: These losses have a clear dollar value. They may include emergency care, hospital bills, surgery, therapy, rehabilitation, lost wages, and reduced future income.
  • Non-Economic Damages: These damages cover losses that do not come with a receipt. They may include pain, emotional distress, trauma, anxiety, and reduced quality of life.
  • Wrongful Death Damages: If a technology-related accident results in a death, eligible family members may seek compensation. This may include funeral costs, burial expenses, lost financial support, and loss of companionship.
  • Punitive Damages: In rare cases, a court may award punitive damages. These require proof of oppression, fraud, or malice. They may apply if a company acted with willful misconduct or kept selling a product it knew was unsafe.

Compensation also depends on where the money may come from. That often means identifying the right insurance policies and responsible parties. Many injured victims seek free advice from technology accident lawyers early on to know what proof they need to demonstrate different types of losses.

How Insurance Applies To Technology Accident Claims

Technology accidents often trigger overlapping insurance policies from different companies involved in the design, production, and sale of a product. These providers may attempt to shift blame among themselves to minimize their own financial exposure. Insurers may also dispute the facts of the case to delay or deny your claim.

The main policies that may apply include:

  • Technology Errors & Omissions (E&O) Insurance: This may cover losses arising from faulty tech services, software failures, defective algorithms, or poor system design. However, many E&O policies limit or exclude bodily injury, product liability, and auto-related claims, so the policy language matters.
  • Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance: This may cover injuries or property damage caused by a company’s products or business operations. Exclusions may apply for auto use, professional services, cyber events, or technology-related services.
  • Auto Insurance Coverage: The California DMV requires owners and drivers of automotive vehicles to carry these minimum coverage limits:

    • $30,000 for injury/death to one person.
    • $60,000 for injury/death to more than one person.
    • $15,000 for property damage.
  • Rideshare Coverage: Transportation network companies, such as Uber and Lyft, must carry insurance for crashes involving their drivers. Coverage may depend on whether the driver was waiting for a ride request, had accepted a ride, or was transporting a passenger. In some rideshare accidents, available coverage may reach up to $1 million.

Other policies may also apply, depending on how the accident happened:

  • Medical Payment (MedPay) Coverage: This coverage may pay your medical bills or those of your passengers, regardless of who caused the accident.
  • Uninsured Motorist (UM) & Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Coverage: This coverage may apply if the responsible party has no insurance or not enough insurance.
  • Workers’ Compensation: If the injury happened at work, workers’ compensation may cover medical care and part of your lost wages.
  • Umbrella Insurance: Some tech companies carry umbrella policies. These may provide additional coverage after the primary policy limits run out.

Insurance adjusters work for the insurance company, not for you. They may call soon after the accident and ask detailed questions. They may also offer a fast settlement before you know the full cost of your injuries.

Strong evidence gives you more leverage. It can help show how the technology failed and which policy should cover your losses.

What Evidence Matters In A Technology Accident Claim?

Digital data often makes or breaks a technology accident claim. Tech companies may delete logs, overwrite system data, or push software updates after an incident. Once key data is gone, it may be impossible to recover. The device, vehicle, or system itself may store some of the most important evidence.

Your attorney may need to preserve records such as:

  • Source Code & Training Data: These records show how developers built the AI system and how they designed it to act.
  • Hardware & Software Maintenance Records: These logs show whether the company updated, repaired, or serviced the system on time.
  • Event Data Recorders (EDRs): These “black box” records may show speed, braking, steering, and sensor data from the moments before impact.
  • Automated Vehicle Cameras: Some vehicles record video from several angles. This footage may show how the crash happened.

Other records may also help prove your claim. These can include:

  • Manufacturer Communications: Emails, user manuals, safety warnings, and internal notes about known problems.
  • Cellphone Records: Call logs, app activity, or other phone data from the time of the incident.
  • Dashcam Footage: Video from cameras inside or outside a vehicle.
  • Surveillance Footage: Video from traffic cameras, nearby businesses, or doorbell cameras.
  • Police Reports: Reports may include scene details, officer observations, and citations.

A technology accident attorney can send a legal hold notice to the tech company. This notice instructs the company to retain relevant data and to stop routine deletion.

Technology Accident Injuries And How They Affect Compensation

The severity of your physical injuries directly influences the financial value of your technology accident claim. Severe trauma from malfunctioning machinery or automated vehicles requires extensive medical treatment and forces victims out of work. Thoroughly documenting these profound life changes allows your legal team to pursue a comprehensive financial recovery.

Technology accidents may cause serious injuries, such as:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury: A hard hit from a self-driving vehicle, robot, or machine can injure the brain. A brain injury can affect memory, speech, mood, movement, and work.
  • Spinal Cord Injury: A crash or machine failure can damage the spinal cord. Victims may require using a wheelchair, making changes to their home, chiropractic treatments, or daily care.
  • Loss of a Limb: Automated machines, robots, or sharp moving parts can cause the loss of an arm, leg, hand, or foot. These injuries may require surgery, prosthetics, therapy, and job training.
  • Severe Burns & Electrical Injuries: Battery fires can cause severe burns and electrical injuries. Electrical failures can also lead to burns. They may damage nerves and leave scars. Some people may need skin grafts and long-term care.
  • Internal Injuries: A hard crash or system failure can damage internal organs. These injuries may require emergency surgery and follow-up treatment.
  • Vision or Hearing Loss: Blasts, sensor problems, or laser failures can harm a person’s sight or hearing. These injuries can affect work, independence, and daily life.

The more an injury affects your health, work, and daily life, the more important it becomes to document the harm it causes.

Attorney discusses technology accident injury claim with client wearing arm sling and wrist brace in professional law office

What Typically Happens After A Technology Accident Claim Begins

After you hire an attorney, your claim moves through several steps. Your legal team handles the claim while you focus on healing. These cases might take more time than regular injury claims. This is often due to the involvement of software, data, experts, and large companies.

A technology accident claim may include the following steps:

  1. Investigation & Liability Review: Your lawyer gathers sensor data. Experts collect AI logs. They also get maintenance records and other proof. They look for a product defect, a software error, an operator mistake, or another factor that may have caused the accident.
  2. Discovery Phase: Both sides exchange evidence. In a technology case, this may include source code, algorithm data, system logs, and company records.
  3. Settlement Negotiations & Mediation: Many cases settle before trial. Your attorney presents your damages and negotiates with the other side.
  4. Trial: If the case does not settle, it may proceed to a judge or a jury. Technical experts may explain the system failure in plain language.
  5. Appeals: Either side may appeal the result. Appeals can take more time, especially when the case raises new questions about AI, software, or automated systems.

Deadlines And Time Limits For A Technology Accident Case

In California, you generally have two years to file personal injury lawsuits, including those that arise from technology accidents. Notably, different time limits may apply in limited situations. Regardless, you must act on time. If you miss a legal deadline, the state’s courts can bar your case, and you may lose your right to seek compensation.

Important deadlines may include:

  • Most Injury Cases: You usually have two years from the injury date to file a lawsuit in California.
  • Claims Against the Government: You may have less time if a city, county, or state agency owned or used the technology that caused your harm. In many cases, you must file a government claim within six months before you can sue.
  • Cases Involving Children: Different rules may apply if the injured person is under 18. They usually have until age 20 to file a case. Parents can file a claim before that.

Why Hire Arash Law After A Technology Accident

Technology accident claims can be hard to prove because the company may control the records that show what went wrong. These records may include software logs, device data, video, and other system information. These complications can lead victims to realize, “I need a personal injury lawyer to handle my case.”

Arash Law can:

  • Review the accident, system records, and other evidence to find out what happened.
  • Work with technology experts when the case needs a deeper review.
  • Request video, device data, and system logs before a company deletes or changes them.
  • Deal with insurance adjusters and company representatives on your behalf.
  • Send formal notices to help protect important evidence.

If your concern is the cost of hiring a lawyer, our experienced attorneys work on a contingency fee basis. That means you don’t need to pay up front to get representation. So, do our lawyers only get paid if they win? Yes, our lawyers only collect their fees if we recover compensation for you.

Frequently Asked Questions About Technology Accidents

Technology injury cases raise questions that standard injury claims may not. You may wonder whether you can sue an AI company, whether you need a lawyer, or who is responsible when no human was driving. The answers below explain the basics.

Most likely. Technology liability cases can be harder than many personal injury claims. These cases often involve software records, system logs, device data, and several companies that may share fault.

A lawyer can help by:

  • Reviewing technical evidence.
  • Working with experts who understand AI, drones, or autonomous vehicles.
  • Identifying every company that may be responsible.
  • Handling insurers and corporate legal teams.
  • Applying new technology rules to your claim.

Because these cases can involve fast-changing laws and evidence that’s difficult to obtain, legal help can make it easier to protect your claim.

It depends on the complexity of your claim. For example, if it takes longer to prepare or goes to court, an attorney may charge more. However, it doesn’t have to cost you anything to hire them up front. Many injury law firms, including Arash Law, handle technology accident cases on a contingency fee basis. That means you pay no attorney fees unless your case results in a recovery. This payment setup lets injured people file claims without paying upfront hourly legal fees.

Possibly. A person does not have to be driving for someone to be legally responsible. If the system was unsafe, the owner, programmer, operator, manufacturer, or repair company may still be at fault.

For example, a self-driving vehicle may cause a crash even when no one is behind the wheel. These self-driving car accidents often raise questions about who launched, programmed, owned, repaired, or controlled the system.

Talk To Arash Law’s California Technology Accident Lawyers

Technology accident claims can involve several companies or insurance providers. They may also depend on digital records, such as device data or video footage.

Insurance companies may argue about who caused the accident. They may also question your injuries or the records that support your claim.

You do not have to deal with them alone. Arash Law’s California technology accident lawyers can review your case and explain your legal options.

Our attorneys help clients in Los Angeles. We also extend our services to San Diego, Orange County, Sacramento, San Bernardino, Riverside, and all of California. We are available to help regardless of where your injury happened.

You don’t need to pay the attorney’s fees unless we win your case or secure a settlement. Call (888) 488-1391 to schedule a free consultation before legal deadlines affect your options.

Arash Khorsandhi
Do You Have A Case?
IF YES, You may be able to recover financial compensation. TELL US MORE:
Do you have a case?
IF YES, You may be able to recover financial compensation. TELL US MORE:

Thank You, We’ll contact you shortly.

DON'T SPEND
HOURS
SEARCHING
FOR ANSWERS
$0 Fees Unless
We Win