
Partner
Brian G. Beecher is a partner and Litigation Department Chair for personal injury and class action practice at Arash Law, led by Arash Khorsandi, Esq., serving clients in key California cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento.
Mr. Beecher has extensive experience handling complex personal injury cases. Mr. Beecher handles all manner of severe injury cases and focuses on traumatic brain injuries because, in part, Mr. Beecher comes from a family of doctors — his brother is a nationally recognized neurosurgeon on the East Coast. Insurance companies may be cautious in handling brain injury claims because these types of injuries are difficult to diagnose in the emergency room. Peer-reviewed medical literature reports that many people who suffer brain damage, and especially people who suffer a mild traumatic brain injury, will not be able to recognize their injury during the first few days, weeks, and even months after the injury-causing incident.
Furthermore, mild traumatic brain injuries cannot be diagnosed through CT scans or MRIs and can only be seen through the use of diffusion tensor imaging of the brain (called a “DTI”). Insurance companies often try to use the gap in time from injury to diagnosis of brain damage and the lack of a CT scan or MRI evidence to argue that there is no brain injury.
Mr. Beecher understands how insurance companies settle claims and has experience with both the legal and medical sides of brain injuries. This enables him to challenge the opinions of defense medical experts that insurance companies employ to counter the victims’ claims. Mr. Beecher also understands how to use objective evidence (e.g., highly reliable diagnostic tests, such as DT MRIs, Videonystagmography/VNG, and PET scans) to demonstrate the extent of a brain injury. Mr. Beecher also understands that brain injuries impact every aspect of a person’s life. Even mild traumatic brain injuries can (and many often do) cause severe changes to a person’s behavior, emotions, cognitive abilities, memory, balance systems, ability to smell and taste, hearing, attention, speech, and more.
Mr. Beecher works diligently to counter insurance company arguments and challenge defense medical opinions so that his clients may have a chance at receiving a verdict or settlement that will support their recovery and address their medical and financial needs.
Mr. Beecher’s practice is to make a thorough effort to settle a case before proceeding to trial. This way, he can present to the insurance company and defense counsel the true extent of his client’s injuries through objective evidence, giving the insurer an opportunity to settle the matter fairly. Mr. Beecher routinely handles matters throughout the State of California, both at the state and federal levels.
Mr. Beecher is also an adjunct professor at Pepperdine University School of Law for both law students and practicing attorneys seeking an L.L.M. in Alternative Dispute Resolution. Mr. Beecher graduated from Pepperdine University School of Law in 2005 after earning his B.S. in psychology from the University of Iowa in 2002. In 2005, Mr. Beecher also received a Master’s Degree in Alternative Dispute Resolution from Pepperdine University, the Straus Institute of Dispute Resolution.
When an insurance company refuses to make a reasonable settlement offer, you may need to file a lawsuit and prepare your case for trial. Sometimes this process is straightforward. Other times, there may be issues with an insurer’s cooperation, which can impact the discovery process your attorney uses to gather information.
These challenges can lead to delays and increased costs. At Arash Law, our attorneys address discovery-related issues, protect your rights throughout the process, and take the appropriate steps to keep your case moving forward.
WAL-MART IN THE NEWS
SIMILAR ARTICLES
Walmart Case | Negligent Security
Brian Beecher's $41.95 million verdict against Walmart shows what happens when a corporation underestimates a case. An elderly couple was shopping at a Walmart in San Jacinto when a homeless man grabbed a baseball bat that had been left unsecured in the store and attacked them, leaving one with a skull fracture and the other with a concussion. On paper, the case looked winnable for Walmart. The attack was committed by a third party, the case was tried in conservative Riverside County, the most invasive treatment either client had received was a spinal cord stimulator trial years after the attack, and Walmart had already won a defense verdict in a similar case years earlier.
Brian built the case around a simple truth: an unsecured bat in a store with lax security made this kind of attack foreseeable. Backed by surveillance footage, witness testimony, and security experts, he dismantled Walmart's defenses at trial, and the jury returned a $41.95 million verdict, finding Walmart 50% responsible and ordering it to pay $30 million. As Brian put it, "Walmart will need to start securing baseball bats in its stores, as this type of attack was foreseeable and may occur again in the future."
We’ll review what happened and tell you what options may be available.
Thank You, We’ll contact you shortly.