Our Bradbury Injury Law Firm Doesn’t Just Win,
We Win Big!

The first step in establishing negligence is demonstrating that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. This duty arises when there is a legal obligation to act in a manner that reasonably ensures the safety and well-being of others.

Once a duty of care is established, the next element to prove is a breach of that duty. You must show that the defendant failed to meet the standard of care expected in the given circumstances. It requires demonstrating that their actions or omissions fell below what a reasonably mindful person would have done in a similar situation.

Causation is a crucial element in establishing negligence. It involves proving that the defendant’s breach of duty directly caused the plaintiff’s injuries or damages. There are two types of causation to consider: the actual cause and the proximate cause.

1. Actual cause refers to showing that the defendant’s actions were a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.
2. Proximate cause requires demonstrating that the harm suffered was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions.

To successfully pursue a personal injury claim, it is essential to provide evidence of actual harm or damages suffered by the plaintiff. This can include physical injuries, emotional distress, medical expenses, loss of income, property damage, or any other losses resulting from the defendant’s negligence.

In some jurisdictions, the concept of comparative negligence applies. This means that the plaintiff’s negligence may be considered when determining the amount of compensation they are entitled to receive. Comparative negligence reduces the damages awarded based on the percentage of fault assigned to the plaintiff.

Be wary of the statute of limitations applicable to personal injury claims. Generally, most cases take up to two years for the plaintiff to make a claim. You must file within the prescribed time frame to avoid the claim being barred.