California Traffic Safety Survey: 2020 VS 2019 Comparison

Table of Contents
    Summary Of Findings Of The 2020 California Traffic Safety Survey

    In 2020, the California Office of Traffic Safety surveyed safety concerns that California drivers had and compared the results with those from 2019. The California Office of Traffic Safety found that the overall safety concerns of drivers had changed in some significant ways in one year. They focused on common areas of safety concern. The survey discussed distracted driving, driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol, speeding, ridesharing, sharing the road with driverless vehicles, and the impact of the COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders put into effect in 2020.

    According to the 2020 California Office of Traffic Safety survey, distracted driving, particularly texting while driving, was identified as a major safety concern by respondents. The survey asked respondents if they used their phones while driving. Respondents self-reported that they rarely or never used their cell phones while driving, but drivers are less likely to report that they made a mistake when driving while using a cell phone or electronic device.

    Summary of Findings

    Respondents also reported that distracted driving, including speeding and aggressive driving, was the second and third largest safety concern in 2020. Surprisingly, driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol did not make the top three safety concerns for California drivers in 2020. Survey responses indicated changes in drinking and driving behaviors from 2019 to 2020, although these changes occurred during a period of significant social and economic disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The frequency of ridesharing apps like Lyft and Uber and designated drivers decreased in 2020 from the numbers reported in 2019. The survey suggested that the Shelter-in-Place orders implemented across California were responsible for this trend. Whether the use of marijuana before driving increased safety risks varied by region. For example, respondents from the Central California region were slightly more likely than those in other regions to believe that marijuana use does not impair motor function.

    In 2020, the number of driverless vehicles sharing the road with motorists increased. Respondents reported that they had at least some level of mistrust of driverless cars. It is a safety concern for most California drivers, regardless of the region from which they respond.

    Respondents were also asked to discuss their comfort level with sharing the roads with bicyclists. Survey results indicated confusion among drivers regarding bicycle road-sharing laws, particularly when no dedicated bike lanes are present. Respondents also reported that they were somewhat uncomfortable sharing the road with a bicyclist when there was no separate bicycle lane.

    Specific Safety Concerns By California Region

    The surveyors separated the survey responses by region. The regions include Northern California, Central California, and Southern California. What follows are each region’s safety concerns:

    Northern California

    • Speeding or Aggressive Driving – 19.7%M.
    • Distracted Driving or Texting While Driving – 19.3%M.
    • Drunk Driving – 17.3%M.
    • Bad Road Surfaces – 11.3 %M.
    • Drugged Driving – 10.7 %M.
    • All Other Concerns Combined – 21.7%M.

    Central California

    • Distracted Driving or Texting While Driving – 19.9%M.
    • Speeding or Aggressive Driving – 17.4%M.
    • Drunk Driving – 17.9%M.
    • Bad Road Surfaces – 10.9%M.
    • Drugged Driving – 11.3%Move.
    • All Other Concerns Combined – 27.7%M.

    Southern California

    • Distracted Driving or Texting While Driving – 19.9%M.
    • Speeding or Aggressive Driving – 19.2%M.
    • Drunk Driving – 18.1 %M.
    • Bad Road Surfaces – 10.4%M.
    • Drugged Driving – 10.1%M.
    • All Other Concerns Combined – 22.3%M.

    What Are The Most Serious Distractions For Drivers By Region?

    Again, the survey reported responses from three regions of California. The survey found that most drivers in each area reported that texting while driving was the most severe driving distraction for California drivers.

    Northern California

    • Texting and Driving – 64.6%.
    • Cellphone Conversations While Driving – 18.9%.
    • Car Crashes and Other Vehicle Issues – 8.3%.
    • Roadside Billboards – 0.6%.
    • GPS or Navigation Systems – 2.3%.
    • Interacting With Passengers in the Car – 1.8%.
    • Drunk Drivers – 0.6%.
    • Construction on Roadways – 0%.
    • Eating While Driving – 1.3%.
    • Other Forms of Inattentive Driving – 0%.
    • Other – 1.7%.

    Central California

    • Texting While Driving – 69.9%.
    • Cellphone Conversations – 15.9%.
    • Car Crashes and Other Vehicle Issues – 5.8%.
    • Roadside Billboards – 3.9%.
    • GPS or Navigation Systems – 1.7%.
    • Interacting With Passengers in the Car – 0.8%.
    • Drunk Drivers – 0%.
    • Construction on Roadways – 0.3%.
    • Eating While Driving – 1.1 %.
    • Other Forms of Inattentive Driving – 0.3%.
    • Other – 0.3%.

    Southern California

    • Texting While Driving – 70.1%.
    • Cellphone Conversations –16.9%.
    • Car Crashes and Other Vehicle Issues – 5.6%.
    • Roadside Billboards –1.5%.
    • GPS or Navigation Systems – 1.5%.
    • Interacting With Passengers in the Car – 1.0%.
    • Drunk Drivers – 0.2%.
    • Construction on Roadways – 0.1%.
    • Eating While Driving – 2.1%.
    • Other Forms of Inattentive Driving – 0.4%.
    • Other – 0.7%

    Cellphone Use While Driving

    Because most respondents reported that texting while driving was their biggest driving concern, the survey further asked drivers about their use of electronic devices while driving. One-third of respondents admitted to regularly or sometimes using their cell phones while driving. Two-thirds of respondents reported that they either rarely or never used their phones when they drove. The tendency for drivers to use an electronic device while operating a vehicle did not change depending on the region of the state where the respondent lived.

    In 2020, a higher number of respondents admitted to regularly or occasionally using their cellphones compared to those who reported such use in 2019. The number of drivers who said they rarely or never use their cellphones increased in 2020 from the number reported in 2019. A total of 44.7% of respondents reported that they made a mistake while driving because they used their cellphone while driving.

    In 2019, 51.3% of drivers said they made a mistake while driving because they used their cellphones while driving. The number of errors made because of cellphone use while driving decreased 6.6% in 2020 from 2019. 51.7% of respondents reported that they have been injured or hurt because another driver was texting or using their cellphone while driving, a 6.2% decrease from 2019.

    Cellphone Use & Tickets

    A majority of respondents to the California Office of Traffic Safety 2020 survey reported that they thought it was likely they would be pulled over for using their cellphone while driving. The survey found that 34.5% of drivers thought it was unlikely to be pulled over and ticketed because of their cellphone use while driving.

    Recall Of Safety Programs

    The 2020 survey asked about specific programs aimed at increasing traffic safety. The survey found that:

    • 30.2% of respondents remembered the “Go Safely California” campaign.
    • 50.3% of respondents remembered the “Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over” campaign.
    • The ‘Pedestrians Don’t Have Armor” campaign was more widely remembered by respondents from Northern California than any other region in the state.
    • 11.4% of respondents remembered the “DUI Doesn’t Just Mean Booze” campaign.
    • 13.3% of respondents remembered the “Put Your Phone Down, Just Drive” campaign, which was an increase in recollection according to the 2019 survey results.

    The respondents were asked where they heard about each campaign. Most respondents answered that they heard about the campaigns by seeing a road sign with a changeable message, or by watching TV or Facebook. Other respondents stated that they learned about the campaigns from Twitter, Instagram, or another website.

    Call our California personal injury attorneys at Arash Law if you have been injured in an accident. Our firm has decades of collective experience representing clients in traffic accident cases. If you have been injured in an accident, call our office or visit us online to schedule a free initial consultation.

    Californians And Driving Under The Influence Of Drugs Or Alcohol

    The California Office of Traffic Safety asked respondents about drug and alcohol use before operating a vehicle. In response to this line of questioning, some drivers admitted that they had operated a vehicle after consuming enough alcohol to feel they were likely over the legal limit. On the other hand, 24% of respondents stated that they did not drink alcohol.

    The survey showed a 9.5% reduction in alcohol consumption before driving. However, the results suggest that the decrease in drinking is a natural consequence of the shelter-in-place order implemented across the state in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey did not show a significant difference in the percentage of drivers who used alcohol before driving among the Northern, Central, or Southern California regions.

    32.8% of respondents admitted that they always used or acted as the designated driver when they went out to drink in 2019. However, in 2020, 39.3% of respondents stated that they used ridesharing apps like Lyft or Uber when they went out to party, a significant decrease in the number of reported users in 2019. The survey chalks this number up to implementing the shelter-in-place order across the state in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    If you have been injured in a traffic accident with a drunk driver, call an experienced lawyer. The injury attorneys at Arash Law have years of experience helping clients pursue compensation for their injuries and damages following an accident. We assist clients in seeking accountability and compensation for injuries and property damage resulting from accidents. Our attorneys are dedicated to working diligently on behalf of our clients to seek a resolution for their case. Contact us by phone or fill out our “Do I Have A Case?” form here to schedule a free case review.

    Recollection of DUI Checkpoints Across the State

    Recollection Of DUI Checkpoints Across The State

    Overall, 55.5% of respondents report that they recalled seeing or at least hearing about a DUI checkpoint being set up by police at least once during the six months before completing the survey. The survey found that respondents who lived in Central California remember seeing or hearing about police DUI checkpoints at a higher rate than any other region in the state. According to the 2020 survey, what follows are the recollections of DUI checkpoints by region:

    • Northern California – 53.5% of citizens recalled a DUI checkpoint.
    • Central California – 64.1% of citizens recalled a DUI checkpoint.
    • Southern California – 54.6% of citizens recalled a DUI checkpoint.
    Awareness Of The Consequences Of Getting A DUI

    According to the 2020 survey results, 90.3% of respondents reported that they knew that being arrested or cited is a consequence of driving while impaired. However, the concern about suffering a result varied from region to region. Respondents from Central California frequently believed that it was very likely that if they drove while impaired, they would get cited or arrested.

    However, respondents from Northern California reported that they thought it was doubtful that they would get pulled over or detained if they drove impaired. The perception that it is highly likely that an impaired person will face the consequences after driving while impaired decreased by 6.8% from 2019 to 2020.

    Driving Under The Influence Of Marijuana

    Respondents across each state region agree that marijuana use affects a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle. Citizens of Central California showed a slightly larger number of respondents who believe marijuana would impair a person’s driving ability. The 2020 survey indicated that a majority of respondents viewed drug-impaired driving as a significant problem. Public perception of drug-impaired driving as a safety concern remained consistent between the 2019 and 2020 surveys.

    Dangers Of Driving Over The Speed Limit

    Most California drivers who responded to the 2020 survey shared a perception that it is unsafe to drive ten miles over the speed limit. However, compared to the number of people who thought it was safe to go over the speed limit in 2019, there was a 23.6% decrease in the number of drivers who believed it was safe to drive over the speed limit, according to the 2020 survey. The 2020 survey results showed a 23.8% increase from 2019 in the number of drivers who reported believing that the speed the driver is traveling determines safety.

    The majority of Central California residents who responded to the survey reported that they thought it was unsafe to drive even five miles per hour over the speed limit. As compared to the results of the California Office of Traffic Safety 2019 survey, fewer people in 2020 believe that it is safe to drive over the speed limit, and some drivers think that it depends on how fast the driver is going. In 2019, 49.8% of drivers believed driving over the speed limit was unsafe. In 2020, 51.8% of drivers thought driving over the speed limit was dangerous.

    Will I Be Pulled Over If I Am Speeding?

    According to the 2020 survey, 67.8% of California drivers believe that if they speed, it is very likely they will be pulled over by a police officer and given a ticket. The number of drivers who thought that they would likely get pulled over by the police for speeding increased by 7.2% compared to 2019.

    Driverless Vehicles

    The 2020 survey asked California drivers about driverless vehicles and how they felt about their increased presence on the road. The 2020 survey found that 24% of California drivers thought driverless vehicles made the roads and freeways safer. Compared to the 35.9% of California drivers who believed driverless cars would make the road safer in 2019. This change in thought reflects an 11.9% decrease in driver confidence in the safety of driverless vehicles.

    According to the 2020 survey results, a majority of drivers in California claimed they were uncomfortable sharing the road with driverless vehicles. In 2019, 46.1% of California drivers reported being comfortable sharing the road with a driverless car. The survey shows no data that suggests why there is a decrease in driver confidence when it comes to driverless vehicles.

    Sharing The Road With Bicyclists

    The 2020 survey showed that 63% of California drivers believed it was legal for motor vehicles and bicyclists to share the roadways and freeways, even when there is no bike lane. In 2019, the number of California drivers who thought it was legal for bicyclists to share the road with motorists reached 80.2%. The survey showed that 72.8% of California drivers reported being comfortable sharing the road with bicyclists if there is a bike lane present. However, 61.3% of respondents claimed that they were uncomfortable sharing the road with a bicyclist if there was no bike lane on the road.

    Respondents were asked about their experiences as pedestrians and bicyclists sharing the road with motorists. The survey wanted to know what dangers pedestrians and bicyclists experienced while traveling. The most frequently reported problem was cars going too fast. Other issues that pedestrians and bicyclists reported include:

    • Lack of sidewalks
    • Lots of traffic
    • Cars not stopping
    • Distracted driving
    • Drivers do not look for pedestrians
    • No bike lanes
    • Drivers not paying attention

    Just as pedestrians and bicyclists have safety concerns caused by motorists, drivers have some safety concerns caused by pedestrians. Some safety concerns that drivers have regarding pedestrians and cyclists include:

    • Pedestrians not using crosswalks.
    • Pedestrians stepping off the curb without looking for traffic.
    • Pedestrians and cyclists are not visible enough.
    • Pedestrians and cyclists are distracted by headsets, ear pods, phones, etc.
    • Cyclists are not stopping at traffic lights or stop signs.
    • No sidewalks or crosswalks.
    • No bike lanes.

    The concerns of motorists about safety around pedestrians and bicyclists are consistent throughout the state. The survey showed consistency in opinion about what safety concerns motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists share when sharing the road.

    Call Our California Accident Law Firm For More Info

    If you have been in an accident, call our California car accident lawyers. Our lawyers have helped clients with their accident cases. We are committed to working diligently on behalf of every client we serve.

    Clients come to our personal injury firm from across the state for our experience and dedication. Our attorneys are dedicated to providing clients and their families with legal support throughout their case.

    We have decades of collective experience in helping clients with various types of injury cases. Our firm handles different types of traffic accidents. If you have been involved in a car, bicycle, motorcycle, truck, or any type of accident, you can call us for legal assistance.

    We are committed to advocating on behalf of accident victims, regardless of how the harm occurred. Arash Law has extensive experience representing clients in various cases and dealing with insurance companies and defense counsel. Contact us if you have been injured in a car accident in California.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Arash Khorsandi, ESQ
    Founder, Arash Law

    Arash Khorsandi, Esq. is the owner and founder of Arash Law, a large injuries and accidents law firm with offices throughout California. Over the years, Arash has built an all-star team of record-breaking lawyers, former insurance company adjusters, and the best paralegal staff in the country in order to ensure that his client’s cases result in the best possible outcome. In fact, our California personal injury law firm has won countless awards and distinctions in the field of plaintiffs Personal Injury law.

    Recover Lost Wages, Property Damages, and Medical Fees.
    Arash Law Practice Area Border/Divider

    We’ll tell you if you have a case or not, call (888) 488-1391 — We’re here 24 hours a day.

    DISCLAIMER: Information provided on this blog is not formal legal advice. It is generic legal information. Under no circumstances should the information on this page be relied upon when deciding the proper course of a legal action. Always obtain a free and confidential case evaluation from a reputable attorney near you if you think you might have a personal injury lawsuit.

    Check More From Our Award-Winning Law Firm
    Yes. Playing loud or fast music makes people drive faster because it raises heart rate, sharpens adrenaline, and distorts speed awareness. Studies show songs over 120 BPM increase speeding and delay reaction time, but keeping the volume below 60% helps...
    Every fourth Thursday of November, we reflect on our blessings and express gratitude by celebrating Thanksgiving with the people we love. For many Americans, the holiday involves traveling long distances to be with their family. As drivers take to the...
    Have you ever found yourself unexpectedly stuck in construction-related traffic, wishing you had known about the roadwork ahead before starting your journey? California’s extensive highway system requires continuous construction, maintenance, and utility work to remain safe and efficient. However, these...
    Schedule Your Consultation with Arash
    or call him directly at (213) 805-7789
    Arash Khorsandhi

    Thank You, We’ll contact you shortly.

    IF YES, You may be able to recover financial compensation. TELL US MORE:
    Do-You-Have-A-Case-mobile
    IF YES, You may be able to recover financial compensation. TELL US MORE: