Using A Cellphone While Driving Definitely Increases Crash Risk

Table of Contents

    If you’re not sure that using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk in California, the statistics might surprise you. While not all studies have found that talking on a cell phone increases the risk of being involved in an accident, what has been consistently noted is that texting or otherwise manipulating a cell phone while behind the wheel increases the risk of an accident. The California car accident lawyers at Arash Law have represented many clients who were injured in such accidents.

    In fact, cell phones and texting aren’t the only things that cause California drivers to become distracted. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) describes distracted driving as any activity that diverts attention from a driver’s chief task of driving.

    Besides the use of electronic gadgets, other distractions might include:

    • Adjusting the music in the vehicle.
    • Eating and drinking.
    • Reading.
    • Grooming.
    • Interacting with passengers or pets.

    However, the crash risk associated with these other activities isn’t as well established as that of using a cell phone while driving, which increases crash risk. Researchers also can’t conclude that prohibiting handheld cell phone use and texting reduces collisions, even though the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) research has established that using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk and that bans on handheld phone use decrease overall phone use.

    It’s no secret that car accidents have increased in recent years, but cell phone use has not. Drivers are distracted by factors other than cell phones. As such, it’s well known that barring cell phone use for drivers while behind the wheel won’t eradicate distracted driving.

    Given the circumstances, a more effective strategy to combat the risk of using a cell phone while driving, which increases crash risk in California, might be to use broader countermeasures. These measures should help drivers remain focused on the road and those that lessen the costs of distracted driving, including crash avoidance technology.

    When Drivers Use Cell Phones

    using a cellphone while driving

    In 2018, a national observational survey revealed that 3.2 percent of motorists stopped at intersections were talking on handheld phones at any given moment during the day. Based on this observational data and self-reported data on handheld and hands-free device use, it’s estimated that 9.7 percent of motorists were using a handheld or hands-free cell phone at any moment of the day.

    Additionally, when it comes to using a cell phone while driving, national observation surveys show that the rate of drivers texting or otherwise using handheld devices at any moment during the day has grown since 2009, particularly with younger drivers. According to a 2018 national observational survey, 2.1 percent of all drivers were observed using handheld devices, a behavior commonly seen among young drivers.

    This represents a marked increase from 2009, when only 0.6 percent of drivers were seen using handheld devices while driving. IIHS observational surveys conducted in Virginia during 2014 and 2018 revealed an increase in cell phone manipulation from 2.3 percent of motorists to 3.4 percent (Kidd & Chaudary, 2019). Interestingly, individuals who often use cell phones while driving may be riskier behind the wheel in other respects as well.

    In another IIHS study, in which drivers were continuously monitored for one year, those who spent a significant amount of their driving time using a cell phone also had the highest rates of near-accidents and accidents. One on-road study revealed that motorists who reported frequent cell phone use switched lanes more often, drove at increased speeds, and did more hard braking than motorists who said they seldom used cell phones while operating their vehicles.

    These behaviors mirror patterns seen in reckless driving accidents, where speeding, frequent lane changes, and poor judgment raise the risk of collisions. When cell phone distractions combine with other reckless behaviors, the chance of a crash grows even higher. Sadly, these situations don’t just cause minor fender benders. Many escalate into fatal car accidents, leaving families devastated by a driver’s choice to use a phone instead of focusing on the road.

    Accident Risk And Cell Phone Use

    Unfortunately, there aren’t any reliable estimates regarding the number of accidents resulting from distracted drivers. However, the attorneys at Arash Law have handled many similar cases. It’s not just that using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk. Other distractions also cause severe accidents.

    Accident risk and using cell phone while drivingThe majority of what is known about cell phones and the risk of accidents comes directly from naturalistic studies. However, they have reliably linked texting or otherwise using a phone with one’s hands to an increased risk. Again, there is inconclusive evidence about whether talking on a cell phone increases accident risk. Still, it is well-known that using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk.

    National police-reported data concerning deadly crashes in the United States during 2019 reveal that 3,142 individuals lost their lives in motor vehicle collisions in which distraction was determined to be a contributing factor, representing almost nine percent of all crash fatalities. Of that figure, 422, or one percent of individuals fatally injured on the roads, are due to collisions involving cell phone use.

    Statistics derived from law enforcement officer-reported crash data almost certainly underestimate the role distraction plays in deadly crashes. Keep in mind that police crash reports aren’t a consistent way to count cell phone-related accidents because motorists don’t usually volunteer that they were on the phone.

    Usually, there is also a lack of other evidence to determine drivers’ phone use. Several studies regarding cell phone conversations have relied on 2010-2013 data from more than 3,000 motorists who were monitored at all times behind the wheel for as many as three years. Three of them (Dingus et al., 2016; Kidd & McCartt, 2015; Guo et al., 2016), including one by IIHS researchers, determined that having a cell phone conversation substantially increased the risk of a car accident compared to times when motorists weren’t visibly distracted, although the risk was limited to drivers ages 16-29.

    In contrast, another breakdown of the same study revealed that talking on a handheld cell phone didn’t substantially increase car accident risk, consistent with a previous IIHS study of cell phone use by 105 motorists over a one-year period. When it comes to texting or otherwise manipulating a cell phone, the evidence is clear.

    The three data analyses from the naturalistic study of over 3,000 motorists established that the risk of a motor vehicle collision was two to six times higher when drivers were manipulating a cell phone compared to times when they weren’t distracted (Dingus et al., 2016; Kidd & McCartt, 2015; Owens et al., 2018). There was a notable increase in car accident risk for drivers under 30 years old and those over 64 years old.

    Almost all experimental studies using instrumented vehicles or driving simulators have reported that certain driver performance measures are impacted by the cognitive distractions associated with cell phone use, which can contribute to the increased crash risk associated with using a cell phone while driving in California. Statistical analyses combining the results of multiple studies showed crucial delays in drivers’ reaction times but no effect of cell phone conversations, lane-keeping, speeding, or following distance (Caird et al., 2008; Horrey & Wickens, 2006).

    Another analysis combined the results of 28 experimental studies of instrumented vehicles or driving simulators, which showed that typing or reading text messages critically reduced a driver’s reaction time, increased their lane deviations, and increased the length of time drivers took their eyes off the roadway.

    At Arash Law, we recognize that using a cell phone while driving increases the risk of crashes. It also impacts how motorists look for and process information from the roadway. Motorists typically look away from the road to dial or manipulate a handheld cell phone. In contrast, drivers engaged in cell phone conversations and other forms of cognitive distraction tend to focus their eyes toward the center of the roadway (Recarte & Nunes, 2000; Recarte & Nunes, 2003; Reimer et al., 2012).

    However, their attention may continue to be diverted from driving, making it challenging for drivers to fully understand what they are looking at and make instant decisions accordingly. Studies reveal that when drivers are cognitively distracted, brain activity associated with visual processing and attention is suppressed (Bowyer et al., 2009; Strayer et al., 2006; Just et al., 2008). As such, cognitive distractions can result in “inattention blindness,” causing drivers to fail to understand or process information from what is in the roadway, even when they are looking directly at it.

    Using A Cell Phone While Driving Increases Crash Risk: Laws Concerning Driving And Cell Phone Use

    Using a cell phone behind the wheel takes a driver’s focus off the road, making crashes more likely. Victims of distracted driving often suffer serious injuries and face long recoveries, medical bills, and ongoing stress. These accidents don’t just affect drivers but also endanger passengers, pedestrians, and other road users.

    Cellphone distractions contribute to many types of accidents, including:

    When victims are hurt in these crashes, car accident claims may help them pursue damages for medical care, lost wages, and other losses. To understand how these crashes happen, it’s important to look at the laws that limit cell phone use while driving.

    Hand-Held Cell Phone Bans

    Laws prohibiting handheld phone conversations while driving are widespread in other countries. They are becoming more and more common here in the United States. In 2001, New York was the first state to ban handheld phone conversations by all drivers. Currently, 24 states and the District of Columbia have similar laws in place.

    Texting Bans

    Texting is banned for all drivers in 48 states and the District of Columbia.

    teen driver using a phone while driving

    Young-Driver Phone Use Bans

    Thirty-six states and the District of Columbia have phone use bans that are explicitly targeting younger drivers. For more information, you can find cell phone use laws by state in detail here.

    IIHS determined that all-driver bans on handheld phone conversations can have significant and long-term impacts on phone use (McCartt et al., 2010; Braitman & McCartt, 2010). Phone bans designed to target younger drivers seem not as effective (Foss et al., 2009; Goodwin et al., 2012). There is negligible data on texting bans and driver compliance.

    There is negligible data on texting bans and driver compliance. A 2009 IIHS survey of motorists found that of those ages 18-24 years, 45 percent admitted to texting while driving in states that bar the practice, and almost 48 percent of motorists reported texting in states without bans.

    To increase compliance with the cell phone and texting bans, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) ran high-visibility enforcement campaigns in:

    • Hartford, CT
    • Syracuse, NY
    • The Sacramento Valley region, CA
    • The state of Delaware

    In fact, the number of motorists seen with a phone to their ear went down once publicized, high-intensity enforcement of handheld cell phone and texting ban programs were implemented (Cosgrove et al., 2011; Schick et al., 2014). Observed manipulation, such as dialing or texting of handheld phones, went down substantially in Syracuse, NY, and Hartford, CT, after the enforcement initiative.

    It didn’t decline in the comparison communities. Some studies revealed that bans on handheld phone use have led to reductions in motor vehicle accidents. However, the evidence is not conclusive yet. Early analyses by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) determined that accident claims either didn’t change or increased with handheld phone bans, as well as texting bans.

    Later, IIHS examined eleven studies regarding the effects of all-driver handheld phone bans and texting bans on crashes, including the two HLDI studies. The results were mixed. However, many of these early studies were completed before smartphones became pervasive in our society. Although recently, several studies have established that fatal crashes have decreased in states that ban handheld phone use (Flaherty et al., 2020; French & Gumus, 2018; Rocco & Sampaio, 2016; Rudisill et al., 2018). It should be noted that these studies had operational limitations and wide discrepancies in estimated effects.

    Car Technology To Combat Distraction And Increased Crash Risk Posed By Cell Phones

    We know that using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk, but what can be done about this problem? Besides simply not driving while distracted or while using a cell phone, either handheld or hands-free, there are other approaches. There’s no arguing that using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk, but what can be done to decrease these risks?

    Crash Avoidance Technology

    Crash avoidance technology is arguably one promising way to reduce crash risks related to driver distractions of all types. Suppose it detects the potential for a collision. In that case, warnings provided by this technology can redirect a distracted, inattentive, or sleepy driver’s attention back onto the roadway where it should be. Some systems attempt to prevent the accident altogether if a motorist doesn’t act fast enough or doesn’t respond to the warnings at all.

    Infotainment Systems

    Automakers are also placing modern “infotainment” systems into cars and trucks to let motorists and their passengers plug in or wirelessly connect portable electronic devices such as cellphones to the vehicle’s entertainment and communication systems. It’s common for many newer infotainment systems and portable devices to respond to voice commands.

    Numerous investigational studies have established that motorists take shorter glances away from the roadway and keep their eyes on the road for a more significant portion of the time when using voice commands compared to when using their hands to control their phone or infotainment system (Ranney et al., 2005; Owens et al., 2010; Owens et al., 2011; Mehler et al., 2016; Reimer et al., 2016). The same is true for older drivers as well as younger drivers (Reagan et al., 2019).

    Keep in mind that voice systems aren’t all the same, and their benefits may vary (Reagan & Kidd, 2013), depending on the type of system, the vehicle in which it is placed, and the person using it. One IIHS study determined that drivers were able to make calls and enter addresses into a navigation system during highway driving quickly and kept their eyes on the road longer when using a system requiring a single detailed voice command to complete the tasks, as opposed to a system with multiple voice commands used to navigate different menus.

    It should also be noted that motorists experience many more errors when entering an address using one long voice command compared to entering it using several short voice commands. How or if voice recognition technology impacts crash risk is currently unknown. NHTSA has voluntary guidelines for integrated infotainment systems in its effort to reduce the manual and visual distraction potential of these systems. NHTSA has also identified similar voluntary guidelines for makers of portable and aftermarket devices.

    Restricting Cell Phone Use While Driving

    Using a cell phone while driving increases crash risk, but cell phone accessibility can be controlled with new apps. There are also smartphone applications available that restrict or limit access to electronic devices while on the road. These apps typically work when vehicles are in motion and can:

    • Silence the phone.
    • Redirect incoming calls to voicemail.
    • Respond to any incoming text messages with a preprogrammed message.

    Apple unveiled its own Do Not Disturb While Driving feature in the fall of 2017, and several other brands have followed by creating their own app. An IIHS iPhone user survey found that about 20 percent had the feature set to activate automatically when they got behind the wheel.

    Even still, drivers can’t solely rely on technology to keep them away from their phones and undistracted or to avoid accidents. If a distracted driver injured you, our attorneys can help you explore your legal options for potential compensation. The California distracted driving accident lawyers at Arash Law know this full well and can advocate for your legal rights.

    Did Cell Phone Use Cause Your Car Accident? Call Arash Law For Help

    Using a cell phone while driving significantly increases the risk of a crash. Our California personal injury attorneys have represented clients in numerous personal injury cases involving distracted drivers. Furthermore, we assist motor vehicle accident victims in San Francisco, San Jose, San Diego, Sacramento, Sherman Oaks, Riverside, and the rest of California.

    Call Arash Law at (888) 488-1391 or complete our “Do I Have A Case?” form to schedule your free car accident case review. With our contingency fee policy, you won’t owe us legal fees unless we settle your case against the at-fault parties or obtain compensation from a verdict. While some case costs still apply regardless of the outcome, our fee structure provides you with access to experienced legal representation without upfront expenses. We will discuss this with you during your consultation.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Arash Khorsandi, ESQ
    Founder, Arash Law

    Arash Khorsandi, Esq. is the owner and founder of Arash Law, a large injuries and accidents law firm with offices throughout California. Over the years, Arash has built an all-star team of record-breaking lawyers, former insurance company adjusters, and the best paralegal staff in the country in order to ensure that his client’s cases result in the best possible outcome. In fact, our California personal injury law firm has won countless awards and distinctions in the field of plaintiffs Personal Injury law.

    Recover Lost Wages, Property Damages, and Medical Fees.
    Arash Law Practice Area Border/Divider

    We’ll tell you if you have a case or not, call (888) 488-1391 — We’re here 24 hours a day.

    DISCLAIMER: Information provided on this blog is not formal legal advice. It is generic legal information. Under no circumstances should the information on this page be relied upon when deciding the proper course of a legal action. Always obtain a free and confidential case evaluation from a reputable attorney near you if you think you might have a personal injury lawsuit.

    Check More From Our Award-Winning Law Firm
    In a multiple-vehicle collision on icy roads, different parties could share fault. These may include: Drivers Vehicle owners Vehicle or parts manufacturers Mechanics Government entities Contractors Liability depends on what contributed to the multi-car pileup. The California Civil Code uses...
    Throughout the year, many holiday shoppers eagerly anticipate the bargains on Black Friday. As a result, from now until the New Year, holiday retail districts and mall parking lots see significantly higher pedestrian volume. With this rise, you can also...
    The most important steps to take after a Christmas accident are to ensure your safety, document the incident, and obtain necessary medical care. Once you are safe and the situation is under control, focus on gathering information and deciding whether...
    Determining who is at fault in a car accident starts with the evidence. Police reports, photos, videos, skid marks, and witness accounts help reconstruct the collision and determine who was at fault. Investigators and insurance companies review these details to...
    Most of the time, the driver of the vehicle at the back is at fault in rear-end collisions. However, that isn’t always the case. California law recognizes exceptions, such as when the driver of the vehicle in front plays a...
    Schedule Your Consultation with Arash
    or call him directly at (213) 805-7789
    Arash Khorsandhi

    Thank You, We’ll contact you shortly.

    IF YES, You may be able to recover financial compensation. TELL US MORE:
    Do-You-Have-A-Case-mobile
    IF YES, You may be able to recover financial compensation. TELL US MORE: